Contact Us for a Free Consultation (818) 781-1570

Blog

Individual Federal Criminal Charges for Corporate Acts: Defending Executives and Managers

Posted by Dmitry Gorin | Feb 26, 2021 | 0 Comments

When a business comes under federal scrutiny, the corporate veil will not protect its leadership.

Individual Federal Criminal Charges for Corporate Acts: Defending Executives and Managers

Today, federal prosecutors, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and agencies such as the FBI and the SEC are aggressively pursuing individual federal criminal charges for corporate acts.

Executives, C-suite officers, and mid-level managers face serious personal consequences, such as multi-year prison terms and significant financial restitution, for actions taken on behalf of their company.

Navigating a white-collar investigation requires an immediate, sophisticated legal defense.

Whether you have received a grand jury subpoena, been served a search warrant, or are already facing an indictment for corporate fraud, understanding your constitutional rights is critical to safeguarding your liberty, professional reputation, and personal assets.

Under Federal Scrutiny? If you are currently under audit or federal investigation for corporate acts, contact the nationally recognized defense team at Eisner Gorin LLP immediately at (818) 781-1570 for a confidential case evaluation.

Quick Reference Summary: Corporate vs. Individual Liability

Metric / Aspect

Corporate Liability

Individual Liability

Primary Targets The corporate entity itself. Executives, C-suite officers, and managers.
Common Penalties Asset forfeiture, corporate fines, monitorship. Federal prison sentences, personal restitution, permanent industry bars.
Standard of Proof Conduct by employees acting within the scope of employment to benefit the company. Personal knowledge, intent (mens rea), or direct participation/willful blindness.
Typical Statutes 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, 1031. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1341, 1343, 371 (Conspiracy).
Primary Defense Focus Compliance program efficacy; civil resolutions (DPAs/NPAs). Lack of intent, good faith reliance, lack of knowledge, duress.

Why Individuals Are Charged for Corporate Crime

Federal agencies—including the Department of Justice (DOJ), the FBI, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the IRS—devote substantial resources to prosecuting white-collar crime. A major point of contention in these cases is the focus on individual accountability.

Legal scholars and defense attorneys often highlight a critical flaw in federal prosecution patterns: prosecutors frequently target lower- to mid-level managers rather than the high-level executives who establish the corporate culture.

This often results in individuals being held criminally responsible for carrying out broad corporate directives they did not originate or for operating under vague, overbroad statutes in which they lacked a full understanding of the underlying illegality.

Common Types of Corporate Fraud

Corporate fraud generally involves sophisticated schemes to misrepresent facts for financial gain. Common investigations involve:

  • Financial Fraud: "Cooking the books," concealing debts or assets, and fabricating sales or receipts.

  • Asset Misappropriation: Embezzlement of corporate funds, fraudulent transfer of corporate assets, or misusing employee retirement/pension funds.

  • Intellectual Property Theft: Stealing business trade secrets or patents.

  • Tax Crimes: Submitting false corporate tax returns or using business funds for personal gain.

2 Examples of Individual Corporate Liability

Example 1: The Misled Mid-Level Manager (Lack of Intent)

A regional logistics manager is instructed by executive leadership to approve certain shipping manifests that include inflated valuation metrics. The manager depends on the accounting department's guarantees that these figures are legally compliant.

If the federal government brings charges of wire fraud, a key defense strategy would demonstrate that the manager lacked the required mens rea (criminal intent) and acted in good faith, having been entirely isolated from the broader fraudulent scheme.

Example 2: The CFO and "Willful Blindness"

A Chief Financial Officer overlooks internal audit warnings that suggest a subsidiary is reporting fraudulent revenue figures.

Although the CFO did not directly forge the false receipts, federal prosecutors could charge them under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud) by alleging "willful blindness"—claiming that the executive intentionally ignored likely illegal activities within the company.

5 Key Related Federal Laws

  • 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements): Defines a crime for deliberately submitting false or fraudulent statements within federal jurisdiction.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud): Prohibits using the U.S. Postal Service or any private or commercial interstate carrier to carry out schemes that defraud or illegally acquire money or property under false pretenses.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud): Prohibits using interstate wire, radio, or TV communications—such as emails, bank wires, and internet transmissions—for the purpose of advancing a fraudulent scheme.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 1031 (Major Fraud Against the United States): Targets schemes intended to defraud the United States or acquire property through false pretenses in any procurement contract worth $1,000,000 or more.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Conspiracy to Commit Offense or to Defraud United States): Charges individuals who collaborate with one or more persons to commit a federal crime or defraud a federal agency, as long as at least one overt act is undertaken toward achieving that goal.

Defense Strategies Against Individual Charges

To effectively defend against individual charges, you need an experienced federal criminal defense lawyer who can analyze complex audits and financial documents. Essential defensive strategies include:

  • Challenging the Loss Calculation: According to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the length of prison sentences often depends significantly on the estimated or actual financial loss. Aggressively challenging and minimizing this loss estimate can substantially reduce the potential severity of sentencing.

  • Lack of Knowledge and Intent: Showing that the person was only following company orders without knowing about the fraud involved.

  • Corporate Resolution Negotiation: Using the corporate structure to negotiate a resolution whereby the company admits civil or criminal liability—like paying fines or restitution—in exchange for dropping or reducing charges against individual employees.

  • Constitutional Defenses: Challenging broad or vague applications of federal laws, or suppressing evidence acquired through faulty search warrants.

Crucial Note: Restitution strategy and asset protection are equally important as defending in a criminal trial. Understanding how restitution is determined, knowing where it can be legally contested, and selecting legitimate asset protection methods should be managed alongside your defense.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Can I be sent to prison for corporate fraud even if I didn't profit personally?

Yes. Federal criminal law does not require you to have personally taken money to be convicted of corporate fraud or conspiracy. If you knowingly helped or took part in a scheme to defraud investors, consumers, or the government on behalf of the company, you could face significant federal prison time.

What should I do if federal agents serve a search warrant at my corporate office?

Stay calm, courteous, and cooperative, but avoid answering any significant questions about corporate operations unless legal counsel is present. Ask for a copy of the warrant, confirm the scope of the search, record what is seized, and contact a federal criminal defense attorney right away.

How do federal prosecutors determine the length of a prison sentence in corporate fraud cases?

Federal judges primarily depend on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, with the amount of loss linked to the fraud being the most significant factor in white-collar cases. Additional considerations include your role in the offense (such as organizer versus minor participant) and the number of victims involved.

Can a corporation pay for my individual criminal defense attorney?

Often, yes. Corporate bylaws typically include indemnification clauses that either require or authorize the company to pay legal fees for directors, officers, and employees involved in actions connected to their corporate roles. However, if a conflict of interest develops, it is essential to have independent counsel who owes loyalty solely to you.

What is the difference between a grand jury subpoena and a target letter?

A grand jury subpoena asks for documents or testimony and doesn't automatically mean you're accused of a crime; you might just be a witness.

Conversely, a target letter from a federal prosecutor clearly states that the government has significant evidence connecting you to a crime and that you are a designated target of an investigation. In either case, you should seek immediate legal counsel.

Nationwide Federal White-Collar Criminal Defense Representation

When you are held personally accountable for corporate actions, selecting the right legal counsel can significantly impact your future. Defending federal corporate fraud charges demands attorneys with deep expertise in forensic accounting, federal auditing protocols, and the operations of government agencies.

Eisner Gorin LLP is an elite, nationally recognized criminal defense firm ranked in the Top 1% of U.S. law firms.

Our powerhouse defense team comprises former senior prosecutors and State Bar Certified Criminal Law Specialists with more than 60 years of combined trial experience. 

We routinely secure favorable resolutions—including securing pretrial dismissals, minimizing loss calculations, and negotiating civil diversions that keep our clients out of federal prison.

Proven Track Record in Complex Federal Matters

Our firm's proactive legal defense strategy targets every stage of a white-collar case:

  • Pre-Filing Intervention: Collaborating effectively with agency subpoenas to handle investigations discreetly and avoid the issuance of formal indictments.

  • Massive Financial Cases: Successfully litigating complex, high-stakes federal fraud cases across multiple jurisdictions, involving alleged financial damages of over tens of millions of dollars.

  • Aggressive Bail Litigation: Getting quick release or better bond conditions for corporate executives involved in complicated multi-state indictments.

Location and Direct Contact Information

If you've been informed of an internal corporate audit, received a subpoena from the FBI or SEC, or are under federal investigation, prompt action is crucial. We represent clients locally in Southern California and handle high-profile federal cases in U.S. District Courts nationwide.

Office Location

Address Details

Direct Access

Century City Office

2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 800

Los Angeles, CA 90067

Phone:  
(818) 781-1570
Encino

16000 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1000

Encino, CA 91436

Phone:
(818) 781-1570

Related Legal Topics

About the Author

Dmitry Gorin

Dmitry Gorin is a State-Bar Certified Criminal Law Specialist, who has been involved in criminal trial work and pretrial litigation since 1994. Before becoming partner in Eisner Gorin LLP, Mr. Gorin was a Senior Deputy District Attorney in Los Angeles Courts for more than ten years. As a criminal tri...

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today

Eisner Gorin LLP is committed to answering your questions about Criminal Defense law issues in Los Angeles, California.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Make A Payment | LawPay

Menu