Contact Us for a Free Consultation (818) 781-1570

Influence Officer

18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or Injuring an Officer or Juror Generally

Federal laws concerning obstruction of justice are essential to preserving the integrity of the judicial process for prosecuting criminal offenses. Under 18 U.S.C. 1503, it is a serious federal crime to influence or harm an officer or juror while participating in this process.

If you are convicted of this crime, you could face an extended time in federal prison, depending on the severity of the offense and the level of harm done to the victim. If an officer or juror is killed, the penalty could be life imprisonment or even death.

18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or Injuring an Officer or Juror Generally
18 U.S.C. 1503 makes it a federal crime to influence or harm an officer or juror while serving.

18 U.S.C. 1503 says, "(a) Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United States, or officer who may be serving at any examination or other proceeding before any United States magistrate judge or other committing magistrate, in the discharge of his duty, or injures any such grand or petit juror in his person or property on account of any verdict or indictment assented to by him, or on account of his being or having been such juror, or injures any such officer, magistrate judge, or other committing magistrate in his person or property on account of the performance of his official duties, or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial of a criminal case, and the act in violation of this section involves the threat of physical force or physical force, the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed for any offense charged in such case.

(b )The punishment for an offense under this section is-

(1) in the case of a killing, the punishment is provided in sections 1111 and 1112.

(2) in the case of an attempted killing, or a case in which the offense was committed against a petit juror and in which a class A or B felony was charged, imprisonment for not more than 20 years, a fine under this title, or both; and

(3) in any other case, imprisonment for not more than ten years, a fine under this title, or both."

What is the Background of this Law?

18 U.S.C. 1503 has its roots in early 20th-century legislation. Originally enacted as part of the United States Code in 1909, this statute has undergone significant amendments to address evolving judicial needs and challenges.

Notable revisions include those made in 1982 by the Victim and Witness Protection Act, which expanded the scope to cover acts of tampering with or retaliating against jurors and court officers. Subsequent amendments in 1994 and 1996 refined the penalties associated with violations involving physical force or threats.

What Does the Law Prohibit?

18 U.S.C. 1503 criminalizes actions that interfere with the judicial process by targeting grand jurors, petit jurors, or court officers participating in any federal court proceeding.

It forbids any attempts to influence, intimidate, or harm these individuals to obstruct the fair administration of justice. This includes both direct threats and more subtle forms of coercion.

What is the Expanded Scope of the Law?

This law primarily aims to prevent the obstruction of justice by targeting jurors and officers. However, recent interpretations of the law have extended its reach to other behaviors.

Specifically, the law criminalizes any efforts to influence, obstruct, or impede "the due administration of justice." This clause, "the due administration of justice," is called an "omnibus clause," which prosecutors have successfully used to expand the statute's coverage to include other actions that interfere with it.

Courts have interpreted this broadly, allowing prosecution even for acts not explicitly enumerated in the law but similar.

What Must Be Proven to Convict?

To convict you under 18 U.S.C. 1503, the prosecution must typically establish the following elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • Corrupt intent: You acted "corruptly" to influence, intimidate, or impede a juror or court officer. Mere negligence or accidental conduct does not meet this threshold.
  • Action: There must be a concrete action or attempt to influence, intimidate, or impede. This can range from direct threats to more subtle coercion to outright physical force.
  • Connection to Judicial Proceedings: The obstructive act must be connected to an ongoing or anticipated judicial proceeding. The statute covers both civil and criminal cases, ensuring comprehensive protection of the judicial process.

What Are Related Federal Statutes?

18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 Obstruction of Justice has several federal laws that are related to 18 U.S. Code 1503 influencing or injuring an officer or juror generally, including the following:

  • 18 U.S.C. 1501 - Assault on a process server.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1502 - Resistance to extradition agent.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1504 - Influencing juror by writing.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1506 - Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1507 - Picketing or parading.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1508 - Recording, listening to, or observing grand or petit jury proceedings while deliberating or voting.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1509 - Obstruction of court orders.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1511 - Obstruction of state or local law enforcement.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1514 - Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1514A - Civil action to protect against retaliation in fraud cases.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1515 - Definitions for certain provisions; general provision.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1516 - Obstruction of federal audit.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1517 - Obstructing examination of financial institution.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1518 - Obstruction of health care criminal investigations.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1519 - Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1520 - Destruction of corporate audit records.
  • 18 U.S.C. 1521 - Retaliating against a Federal judge or law enforcement officer by false claim or slander of title.

What are the Penalties?

Penalties for violating U.S.C. 1503 can be severe, and the penalties can increase dramatically depending on the nature of the intended obstruction or whether actual harm was done to a victim. The maximum penalties are as follows:

  • For general violations: Up to 10 years in federal prison.
  • For attempted killing or Class A or B felony-level offenses: Up to 20 years in prison.
  • If the victim is killed: The maximum sentence for manslaughter or murder (i.e., five years, eight years, life, or death).

What are the Common Defenses?

Defending against charges under 18 U.S.C. 1503 requires a strategic approach tailored to the case's specifics. Some common defenses a federal criminal defense attorney might utilize include:

  • Lack of Corrupt Intent: Demonstrating that you did not have the requisite corrupt intent associated with the crime. If your attorney can show that your actions were innocent, misinterpreted, or were not intended to intimidate, this could negate the charge.
  • No Injury or Threat: Arguing that your actions did not harm the alleged victim or would not cause a reasonable person to feel threatened or intimidated.
  • No Connection to Judicial Proceeding: Arguing that your actions were incidental and unrelated to an ongoing or future judicial proceeding.
  • Duress or Coercion: Demonstrating that you committed the actions because you were threatened with imminent harm to yourself or your loved ones.
  • Constitutional Defenses: Sometimes, an attorney might argue that your actions were protected under constitutional rights, such as free speech, mainly when the alleged action only involved communication. Any use of physical force would negate this defense.

For more information, contact Eisner Gorin LLP, a federal criminal defense law firm based in Los Angeles, California.

Related Content:

Contact Us Today

Eisner Gorin LLP is committed to answering your questions about Criminal Defense law issues in Los Angeles, California.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Make A Payment | LawPay