Contact Us for a Free Consultation (818) 781-1570

Internet Crimes

Federal Cyber Crimes: Legal Defense & Guidelines

Federal cybercrimes and internet-based offenses are aggressively investigated by federal agencies such as the FBI, DHS, and IRS. Because digital communications and online commerce almost always cross state lines, these offenses are typically charged as federal crimes rather than state offenses.

A federal conviction carries severe penalties, including lengthy prison sentences, substantial fines, and the asset forfeiture (seizure) of property connected to the alleged crime.

Quick Reference Summary Chart

Practice Area / Offense

Key Federal Statute(s)

Primary Elements Required for Conviction

Computer Fraud & CFAA Violations 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Knowingly accessing a protected computer without authorization or exceeding authorized access.
Solicitation of a Minor
18 U.S.C. § 2422 Using interstate commerce (internet/mail) to knowingly persuade, induce, or entice a minor under 18 into illegal sexual activity.
Federal Identity Theft 18 U.S.C. § 1028 Knowingly producing, possessing, or transferring false identification documents or another person's identifying info with intent to defraud.
Credit Card Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1029 Knowingly and with intent to defraud producing, using, or trafficking in unauthorized access devices (cards, account numbers).
Ponzi & Investment Schemes 18 U.S.C. § 1341 & § 1343 Utilizing mail or wire communications to execute a fraudulent scheme paying early investors with new investor capital.
Business Opportunity Fraud 16 CFR Part 437 / 18 U.S.C. § 1343 Deceiving buyers via work-from-home or business setups; failing to provide mandatory FTC material disclosures.
Online Auction & eBay Fraud 18 U.S.C. § 1341 & § 1343 Intentionally defrauding buyers or sellers on digital marketplaces, paired with shipping or electronic payments.

Key Federal Statutes & Related Laws

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) — 18 U.S.C. § 1030

The CFAA addresses unauthorized access to "protected computers," which broadly includes nearly all computers connected to the internet. This law is often invoked against IT consultants, competitive intelligence professionals, or penetration testers if they are accused of exceeding their authorized access.

Aggravated Identity Theft — 18 U.S.C. § 1028A

If someone commits identity theft during the course of certain crimes like wire fraud or bank fraud, federal prosecutors can charge them with Aggravated Identity Theft. This charge results in a mandatory, consecutive 2-year prison term that must be served on top of the sentence for the original crime.

Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud — 18 U.S.C. § 1343 & § 1341

These broad statutes are used to prosecute nearly any online fraudulent scheme. If the internet, email, social media, or digital banking are used to send signals across state lines to advance a scheme, it qualifies as wire fraud. Each transmission can be charged separately, with potential penalties of up to 20 years in prison.

Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud Abuse Prevention Act — 15 U.S.C. §§ 6101–6108

This regulatory framework, in conjunction with the FTC's Business Opportunity Rule (16 CFR Part 437), penalizes deceptive commercial offers, work-from-home scams, and fraudulent multi-level marketing schemes that exploit internet or phone systems to gather upfront fees.

Real-World Case Examples

Example 1: The Authorized Access Misunderstanding (CFAA)

An independent cybersecurity consultant conducts a vulnerability assessment on a company's public web servers. During the process, they find a pivot point leading to an internal database with proprietary trade secrets.

To demonstrate the vulnerability, the consultant downloads a sample data file, believing it aligns with the goals of the security audit.

Since the written contract explicitly authorized testing only the public-facing web servers, the federal government charges the consultant with "exceeding authorized access" to a protected system under the CFAA.

Example 2: The E-Commerce Drop-Shipping Scheme (Wire & Mail Fraud)

An individual creates numerous storefronts on online auction and e-commerce sites, posting listings for luxury electronics using manufacturer stock photos.

They take digital payments from hundreds of buyers across the country but never plan to send the products. To avoid complaints, they upload fake tracking numbers to the platform.

Since the scheme uses interstate electronic communications (such as the internet and digital payment processors) along with the physical postal system to deceive victims, the operator faces multiple charges of Federal Wire Fraud and Mail Fraud.

Example 3: The Multi-Jurisdictional Identity Account Setup (Identity Theft)

A Los Angeles resident employs a virtual private network (VPN) to connect to unsecured public networks, extracting personal identifying information (PII) such as Social Security numbers and birthdates.

The individual then uses this data to open fraudulent credit card accounts online through servers in Virginia, purchasing retail goods shipped to various drop-off points throughout California.

Since the data involved crossing state lines and included financial institutions, the individual is facing federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1028 as well as California state fraud charges.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Why are internet crimes usually prosecuted at the federal level instead of the state level?

Internet traffic transmits data via servers, routers, and infrastructure spread across various states and countries. According to the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause, any criminal activity involving an interstate network is considered interstate commerce.

This inherently gives federal law enforcement agencies—like the FBI or Secret Service—jurisdiction over such offenses.

Can I be charged under the CFAA if I had permission to access a computer system?

Yes. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act penalizes both unauthorized access and excessive use of authorized access.

If you are permitted to access Area A of a network but use your credentials to enter Area B without explicit permission, you could face federal criminal charges—even if your initial entry into the network was legal.

What constitutes "intent to defraud" in a federal white-collar or credit card fraud case?

To secure a fraud conviction, federal prosecutors need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you intentionally deceived a victim to obtain money, property, or honest services.

If the transaction failed because of honest reasons such as a business setback, an accounting error, a lack of technical expertise, or mere negligence, the criminal intent element is absent, forming a key part of the primary defense.

Is physical contact required to be prosecuted for online solicitation of a minor?

No. According to 18 U.S.C. § 2422, the offense is complete as soon as someone uses an interstate facility — like internet chat rooms, email, or messaging apps — to knowingly persuade or entice a minor into illegal sexual activity.

Even just exchanging sexually explicit messages or media can lead to a conviction and a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 10 years.

5. What should I do if a federal agent contacts me but claims I am only a witness?

It is advisable to politely refuse to answer questions or make statements until you have consulted a federal criminal defense attorney.

Federal law enforcement often uses vague language or labels interviews as informal background checks to collect self-incriminating evidence before executing an arrest warrant or filing an indictment.

Navigating a Federal Cyber Investigation

If you or your business are under federal cyber investigation, taking proactive legal steps is essential. Federal agencies typically spend months or even years gathering digital evidence, network logs, and financial data before making an arrest.

An experienced federal criminal defense lawyer at Eisner Gorin LLP can evaluate the technical evidence, conduct an independent investigation, identify flaws in the prosecution's theory of intent, and negotiate with federal prosecutors before formal charges are filed.

Schedule your consultation by calling (818) 781-1570 or using the contact form.

Related Content

Contact Us Today

Eisner Gorin LLP is committed to answering your questions about Criminal Defense law issues in Los Angeles, California.

We'll gladly discuss your case with you at your convenience. Contact us today to schedule an appointment.

Make A Payment | LawPay

Menu