New Hampshire Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers
If you are charged with a federal crime in New Hampshire, your case will likely be heard in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire.
Violations of federal criminal law are handled in federal court by the United States Attorney's Office, not in state or county courts.
Defending these cases demands expertise in the specific issues related to federal investigations, prosecutions, and the federal sentencing guidelines.
Federal cases are often more complex and carry harsher penalties than state cases, with prosecutors having more resources and judges having strict sentencing guidelines.
To improve your chances of a fair outcome, you should consult a federal criminal defense attorney experienced in this court.
Common Cases Heard in the District of New Hampshire
Federal courts handle crimes that violate United States federal law, crimes that cross state and/or international boundaries, crimes occurring on federal land, etc.
While this can encompass a wide array of offenses, certain types of cases are more frequently prosecuted in the District of New Hampshire. These include:
- Drug Trafficking and Conspiracy: Cases involving the distribution, manufacturing, or importation of controlled substances across state or national lines.
- White-Collar Crimes: This category includes offenses like wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, money laundering, and tax evasion.
- Firearms Offenses: Crimes related to the illegal possession, sale, or use of firearms, particularly by individuals with prior felony convictions.
- Child Pornography and Exploitation: Federal law provides severe penalties for the production, distribution, and possession of child sexual abuse material.
- Cybercrimes: Offenses involving computers and the internet, such as hacking, identity theft, and online fraud schemes.
- Immigration Offenses: Crimes related to illegal entry or re-entry into the United States.
Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Interpreting and applying the federal sentencing guidelines is essential in defending federal criminal cases. Although recent court rulings have removed the United States Sentencing Guidelines' mandatory nature, they still play a significant role in federal sentencing in New Hampshire.
The guidelines permit both upward and downward departures in various situations, such as when cooperation is required and when responsibility is accepted.
At Eisner Gorin LLP, we have thoroughly studied the nuances of sentencing guidelines and frequently provide guideline analysis for our clients and other bar members seeking help in their federal criminal cases.
Asset Forfeiture
Federal criminal cases also involve issues related to the forfeiture of property and assets. Asset forfeiture is a complex field, so the US Attorney's Office has specialized attorneys dedicated to seizing funds and property in forfeiture proceedings.
In addition to the immediate effects of a federal criminal case, vigorous forfeiture actions can lead to financial devastation for clients. Our attorneys possess extensive experience handling these challenging circumstances and frequently incorporate forfeiture issues into their case negotiations.
Overview of the District of New Hampshire
The United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire is the sole federal trial court with jurisdiction over the entire state. This means any federal criminal or civil case originating within New Hampshire's borders falls under its authority.
Cases for this district are heard in a single courthouse location:
- U.S. District Court, District of New Hampshire, Warren B. Rudman U.S. Courthouse, 55 Pleasant Street, Concord, NH 03301
The court is composed of a panel of judges who preside over cases. This includes five district judges (who oversee most trials) and two magistrate judges who handle preliminary matters in criminal cases, such as initial appearances, arraignments, and detention hearings.
Major Cities Served by the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire include Concord, Manchester, Nashua, Portsmouth, Dover, and Rochester.
Why the Stakes Are Higher for Federal Criminal Cases
The procedural and substantive differences between federal and state courts are significant. If you're accused of a federal crime, the stakes are generally much higher than if your case were heard in a state court. Some primary differences include:
- Stricter Rules of Procedure: Federal courts operate under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence. These are distinct from New Hampshire's state court rules and are often more formal and strictly enforced.
- Investigative Resources: Federal cases are investigated by powerful federal agencies like the FBI, DEA, IRS, and ATF. These agencies possess vast resources, sophisticated investigative techniques, and nationwide jurisdiction, so by the time you're indicted, the government probably already has a solid case against you.
- Prosecutorial Power: Federal prosecutors, known as Assistant U.S. Attorneys, often have more time and resources to build their cases compared to their state counterparts. The conviction rate in federal court is substantially higher than in most state courts.
- Pre-Trial Processes: The federal pre-trial process, filing of motions, and formal discovery procedures are more complex than in state courts.
- Sentencing Guidelines: Federal sentencing is governed by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. While advisory, these guidelines are highly influential and often result in longer and more severe sentences than those imposed in state court for similar conduct.
Benefits of an Experienced Federal Defense Attorney
Because exposure to federal prison, the application of sentencing guidelines, and having a federal criminal record can significantly affect a person, it is essential for those charged with federal offenses to obtain experienced legal representation.
Hiring a federal criminal defense attorney who is not only licensed to practice in federal court but also has substantial experience in the District of New Hampshire offers distinct advantages.
A lawyer familiar with this specific court provides value that many general practitioners cannot. Advantages include:
- Familiarity with Federal Prosecutors and Judges: An experienced attorney knows the Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the district, their tendencies, and their approach to plea negotiations and trials, as well as the preferences, temperament, and past rulings of the district's judges--which can be invaluable when arguing motions, presenting evidence, etc.
- Mastery of Local Rules: The District of New Hampshire has its own set of local rules that supplement federal procedural rules. Non-compliance can have serious consequences, and an experienced local attorney will have mastered them.
- Access to Resources: Established federal defense attorneys have a network of investigators and expert witnesses who are qualified and experienced in handling the complexities of federal criminal cases.
- Strong Negotiation Skills: Given the higher conviction rates in federal courts, most criminal cases are actually resolved out of court through pre-trial dismissal or plea deals. A good federal defense attorney will employ skilled negotiations with federal prosecutors to ensure you get the best possible terms if a plea deal is your best option.
- Experience with Federal Sentencing: Navigating the complex U.S. Sentencing Guidelines requires specialized knowledge. An experienced federal attorney knows how to argue for variances and departures to achieve a more favorable outcome.
For more information, contact our federal criminal defense law firm, Eisner Gorin LLP in Los Angeles, CA.
Related Content: