The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) Entity List, a crucial tool used by the U.S. Department of Commerce to safeguard national security and foreign policy interests, serves a significant purpose.
The repercussions for companies or individuals on the BIS Entity List are not to be underestimated. They can be severe and potentially disrupt operations both domestically and internationally.
The BIS Entity List compiles foreign entities subject to heightened export restrictions, primarily due to their potential involvement in activities that pose a risk to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.
To be removed from the BIS Entity List, an entity must formally request it from the End-User Review Committee (ERC). The ERC will review the request, and if approved, the removal will be officially published in the Federal Register.
The Entity List is maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and includes foreign entities like businesses, research institutions, and individuals. Certain items exported, reexported, or transferred by entities on the list are subject to additional licensing requirements.
The BIS publishes the names of certain foreign persons that are subject to specific license requirements for the export, re-export, or transfer of specified items. These persons comprise the Entity List, which is found at Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). The persons on the Entity List are subject to licensing requirements and policies supplemental to those found elsewhere in the EAR.
Here's what you need to know about the Entity List, why you might be on it, and, most importantly to get off it.
Purpose of the BIS Entity List
The list's purpose is to prevent the diversion of goods to activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests. Entities are added to the list for various reasons, including involvement in activities related to weapons of mass destruction, terrorism, or sanctions.
BIS first published the Entity List in February 1997 as part of its efforts to inform the public about entities that have engaged in activities that could increase the risk of the diversion of exported, reexported, or transferred items.
Since its initial publication, grounds for inclusion on the Entity List have expanded to activities sanctioned by the State Department and activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.
All requests for removal or modification must be in writing and sent to the Chair of the End-User Review Committee at the specified address. The request should clearly state the reasons why the entity believes it should be removed from the list.
The ERC will consider factors like cooperation with the U.S. government, future compliance with export laws, and any evidence that the entity was placed on the list in error.
The ERC will review the request, and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration will convey the final decision in writing. If the removal request is denied, there may be a process for appealing that decision. If the ERC approves the removal, it will be officially published in the Federal Register, ensuring it is known to the public.
If you or your company is included on the BIS Entity List, it's not just a bureaucratic inconvenience. The potential for serious business consequences is real. It can impede your ability to do business and have a lasting impact on your operations. Understanding and proactively navigating the BIS Entity List is crucial for the survival and success of your business.
What Is the BIS Entity List?
Understanding the BIS Entity List is crucial. The U.S. government uses it to restrict the export, re-export, or transfer of certain items to individuals, companies, and organizations it deems a threat to national security or foreign policy interests. It's a key part of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR), and knowing its implications can help you navigate the complex world of international trade with confidence.
When a person or entity is added to the list, they become subject to specific licensing requirements for the export or transfer of U.S. goods, software, or technology. In many cases, the U.S. will deny those license applications outright, effectively cutting off access to critical materials and technologies.
Being on the list sends a clear message to the international business community: the U.S. government does not trust this party. As a result, U.S. companies—and many foreign ones—will likely avoid doing business with you entirely, even if a transaction is technically legal. This can tank supplier relationships, block funding, halt operations, and destroy reputation.
Getting Added to the Entity List
The reasons for inclusion vary, but they generally fall into a few categories:
- National Security Risks: Entities accused of aiding military programs in adversarial countries (e.g., missile development or cyber-espionage).
- WMD Concerns: Involvement in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
- Human Rights Violations: Ties to surveillance or oppression of minority groups.
- End-Use Violations: Suspicion of using U.S.-origin products for unauthorized military purposes.
Each addition to the Entity List is the result of a formal review process involving multiple U.S. government agencies, ensuring that the inclusion is justified and meets the criteria for national security or foreign policy concerns.
Importantly, placement on the list doesn't require a criminal conviction or even a formal charge. The process is administrative and opaque. The End-User Review Committee (ERC), made up of representatives from multiple federal agencies, makes the final call. This process involves a thorough investigation and evaluation of the entity's activities and potential risks to national security or foreign policy interests.
Checking the Entity List is not a step to be overlooked. Exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) to those persons named on the Entity List are subject to licensing requirements and policies in addition to those elsewhere in the EAR. It's a critical part of your due diligence process and can save you from potential legal and reputational risks.
Failure to adhere to EAR licensing requirements is a violation of the EAR and could result in criminal or civil penalties. BIS recommends that exporters screen the parties to transactions against the Entity List as a standard part of pre-transaction due diligence activities.
Ramifications of Being Listed
Being placed on the BIS Entity List has severe and far-reaching consequences. Here are the most significant ones: It can lead to export restrictions, loss of business partnerships, operational disruptions, and tarnishing of your organization's image, making it challenging to regain trust among potential clients, partners, and investors. These consequences can significantly impact your business operations and prospects. Let's review them below:
- Export Restrictions: U.S.-based companies cannot export to you or your organization without a special license. These licenses are difficult to obtain and often come with additional scrutiny.
- Loss of Business Partnerships: Many businesses, both domestic and international, avoid dealings with anyone on the BIS Entity List due to potential legal exposure or reputational risk.
- Operational Disruptions: The inability to access U.S. goods, services, or technology could interrupt essential supply chains and business operations.
- Being listed can tarnish your organization's image, making it challenging to regain trust among potential clients, partners, and investors.
Each entity on the Entity List is assigned a specific licensing requirement based on the national security or foreign policy considerations associated with its designation on the Entity List.
These licensing requirements and policies are designed to ensure that any export, reexport, or transfer to a listed entity is thoroughly reviewed and approved, thereby minimizing the risk of diversion to activities contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.
The Entity List includes information for each listed entity, including the license requirement, license review policy, and Federal Register citation.
License requirements vary from "all items subject to the EAR," which includes items on the CCL and EAR99 items, to "all items on the CCL" or "all items on the CCL except for specified items."
Getting Removed from the Entity List
The process to secure removal from the BIS Entity List is complex and demands a thorough understanding of U.S. export laws. Below is an overview of the steps involved:
- Submit a Formal Request for Review. The first step in initiating the removal process is submitting a formal request to BIS. This request should provide a detailed explanation of why the designation is no longer applicable. You will need to include evidence demonstrating corrective actions taken since your designation, documentation clarifying your compliance with U.S. export regulations, and proof that you no longer pose a risk to national security or foreign policy interests.
- Address Specific Allegations. Your removal request must also address the specific reasons why you or your company were added to the list. For instance, if the designation stemmed from an alleged violation, provide evidence that shows the issue has been resolved. BIS expects detailed, factual information backed by verifiable documentation.
- Cooperate with Investigators. BIS may conduct its investigation to determine whether your entity should remain on the list. This could involve interviews, site visits, or additional documentation requests. Full cooperation with BIS authorities is necessary to demonstrate your commitment to compliance.
How the Right Attorney Can Help
You should not attempt to navigate the removal process on your own. It's a detailed legal submission reviewed by the same End-User Review Committee that added you to the list.
There's no guarantee of approval and no firm timeline. It can take months, sometimes over a year. If your petition is denied, the review process starts from scratch.
To improve your chances of success, the first time, your best bet is to involve a federal criminal defense attorney with specific knowledge and experience in federal trade laws.
A good attorney can identify specific legal arguments and strategies for your case, help you take steps to demonstrate compliance, coordinate the complex paperwork involved, and advocate on your behalf during the review process.
For more information, contact Eisner Gorin LLP, a federal criminal defense law firm in Los Angeles, California.
Related Content:
